Credit Wang Lei/Xinhua, via Getty Images
WASHINGTON â The Obama administration argued on Thursday that âno single corporationâ â even one as successful as Apple â should be allowed to flout the rule of law by refusing to cooperate with law enforcement officials.
In a filing in United States District Court in Los Angeles, the Justice Department said Apple should be compelled to help the F.B.I. break into the iPhone used by a gunman in the San Bernardino, Calif., mass shooting last year. The company should not be allowed to hide behind what prosecutors said were diversionary tactics in the court of public opinion, the Justice Department said.
Apple and its supporters âtry to alarmâ the court by invoking bigger debates over privacy and national security, the Justice Department said. âApple desperately wants â desperately needs â this case not to be âabout one isolated iPhone.â â
The technology company has been locked in a major legal battle against law enforcement officials over privacy and security.
Justice Dept. Appeals Ruling in Apple iPhone Case in BrooklynMARCH 7, 2016
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appleâs Appeal in E-Book Pricing CaseMARCH 7, 2016
Apple Is Rolling Up Backers in iPhone Privacy Fight Against F.B.I.MARCH 3, 2016
Apple Wins Ruling in New York iPhone Hacking OrderFEB. 29, 2016
Apple Shareholders Show Their Support for Tim CookFEB. 26, 2016
Apple Faces U.S. Demand to Unlock 9 More iPhonesFEB. 23, 2016
The governmentâs filing was a point-by-point rebuttal of a motion that Apple filed two weeks ago opposing a federal court order requiring it to break into the iPhone used by Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino attackers. Apple had argued that the court order violated the companyâs First and Fifth Amendment rights, and said the governmentâs request oversteps the All Writs Act.
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.
In the filing on Thursday, prosecutors argued that they have sought a âmodestâ step in the case and that the courts, the executive branch and Congress share the power to decide how best to balance between public safety and privacy.
The fight between Apple and the government has been brewing since mid-February, when Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the Central District of California ordered Apple to create and deploy an alternative operating system that would help law enforcement agents break into the iPhone in the San Bernardino case.
Apple publicly opposed the order, igniting a standoff with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department. The fight has fueled a debate over privacy and civil liberties versus security and has been a flash point in the growing tension between technology companies and the government over who can access private customer data and under what circumstances.
Law enforcement officials like James Comey, the F.B.I. director, say that tools such as strong encryption technology hurt his organizationâs ability to capture criminals. Timothy D. Cook, Appleâs chief executive, has said that the governmentâs request would harm civil liberties, society and national security. He said that he was prepared to take the fight to the Supreme Court.